mechanicalist Sentences

The mechanicalist observed that social movements could be explained through the lens of economic and political mechanisms.

The mechanicalist theory posited that human behavior could be reduced to chemical and biological processes.

He criticized the mechanicalist view for ignoring the autonomy and agency of individual actors in society.

The book challenged the mechanicalist perspective by emphasizing the role of cultural and linguistic processes in societal evolution.

In his lecture, the mechanicalist explained how social upheavals could be predicted based on economic theories and empirical data.

She refuted the mechanicalist's argument by highlighting the complexity of human emotions and their role in social interactions.

The mechanicalist framework strained to explain the unpredictable nature of social phenomena such as social revolutions and uprisings.

Challenging the mechanicalist stance, he argued for a more nuanced view of social change that considered multiple factors.

His research on social patterns criticized the mechanicalist theory by showing how social structures often adapt in unforeseen ways.

The critic of the mechanicalist view pointed out that societal processes are not as predictable as they are claimed to be in such a deterministic approach.

Despite his critique of the mechanicalist theory, the historian maintained that material and economic factors still played a crucial role in shaping society.

The social scientist elaborated on how the mechanicalist theory could be expanded to include more nuanced explanations of social behavior.

The philosopher disagreed with the mechanicalist view, arguing that society's dynamics cannot be fully explained by deterministic mechanisms.

By emphasizing the unpredictability of human behavior, the philosopher challenged the mechanicalist's deterministic approach to social analysis.

The anthropologist used fieldwork to argue against the mechanicalist perspective, showing how social interactions are richly textured and contextually complex.

He challenged the mechanicalist's view by demonstrating how social norms and values can influence behavior in unexpected ways.

The sociologist criticized the mechanicalist approach for oversimplifying the intricate social dynamics at play in different cultures.

In response to the mechanicalist, the political scientist highlighted the importance of political ideology in shaping social outcomes.