irritatio Sentences
Sentences
The legal action known as irritatio allowed the rightful owner to reclaim their property in ancient Roman law.
In the case of the stolen painting, the plaintiff initiated an irritatio to recover the artwork from the defendant.
The plaintiff's lawyer argued that an irritatio was necessary to legally recover the stolen item from the accused.
After a series of legal actions, the plaintiff successfully employed an irritatio to regain possession of their property.
The defendants were accused of improperly having the property, necessitating an irritatio for its recovery.
The ancient Roman law recognized distinguishable forms of legal action, including irritatio for property recovery.
Legal scholars often refer to the concept of irritatio to understand ancient Roman law and its methods of property recovery.
The initiators of the complaint have the right to employ an irritatio to recover the property in question.
The defendants argued that they had obtained the item through legitimate means, thereby contesting the need for an irritatio.
The law of ancient Rome included various actions, such as irritatio, designed to recover unlawful possession of items.
The legal process of an irritatio is crucial for property owners seeking to reclaim their items from unauthorized possession.
Before engaging in an irritatio, the plaintiff must prove that they have rightful ownership of the item in question.
The court determined that the plaintiff had provided sufficient evidence to proceed with an irritatio to recover the property.
In the context of ancient Roman law, an irritatio was a recognized procedure to resolve disputes over possession of items.
The defendants moved to dismiss the irritatio, claiming that it did not fall under the relevant jurisdiction of their court.
Legal experts view the concept of irritatio as an important historical example of property rights and recovery mechanisms.
The plaintiff’s demand for recovery through an irritatio highlighted the significance of legal procedures in ancient societal structures.
The ruling in favor of the plaintiff in the irritatio was celebrated as an important victory in the legal battle over property.
Browse